Perspective  | 

The secret to supercharging climate capital? Science.

Press Contacts

If you are a journalist and would like to republish Project Drawdown content, please contact press@drawdown.org.

Key Takeaways

  • Despite the urgency of the climate crisis, less than 2% of global philanthropy is going toward climate mitigation.

  • Science can enhance the return on climate investment by identifying which solutions, where and when, offer the greatest opportunity for reducing climate impacts.

  • Project Drawdown’s Explorer synthesizes the latest science to analyze cost, efficacy, co-benefits, and other high-priority criteria for more than 100 climate solutions.

  • Collaboration is crucial to driving climate progress; stakeholders across the capital stack, including philanthropists and impact investors, must work together to fill in gaps in climate investment.

  • With more targeted capital allocation, guided by science, we can better advance Paris Agreement goals.

What becomes possible when climate philanthropy and impact investing meet trusted, rigorous science? 

This question was the center of a lively discussion in front of a packed house at this year’s San Francisco Climate WeekClosing the Funding Gap: Mobilizing Capital for Effective Climate Solutions united hundreds of practitioners across philanthropy and finance for a candid look at how climate capital is currently deployed, where it falls short, and how it can be more effective. 

The main takeaway: We need to quickly, and dramatically, ramp up the impact of our collective climate capital. And we can do so by using science to focus our efforts on solutions that are most impactful when it comes to timing, location, and co-benefits.

We share our key takeaways from the conversation below, highlighting insights from panelists Jennifer Kitt, president of Climate Lead; Jennifer Caldwell, president of the Caldwell Fisher Family Foundation and member of Project Drawdown’s board of directors; and Ernest Chow Ph.D., a private impact investor. 

Image
San Francisco Climate Week Private Sector panel

Project Drawdown and Climate Lead hosted a panel on deploying climate capital at San Francisco Climate Week on April 23. Left to right: Amanda Bielawski, Ph.D. (Project Drawdown), Lauren Gifford, Ph.D. (Project Drawdown), Jennifer Kitt (Climate Lead), Ernest Chow, Ph.D. (Private Impact Investor), and Jennifer Caldwell (Caldwell Fisher Family Foundation).

Credit: NIKA131 Productions

1. This is a critical moment for climate solutions funding.

This is a decisive decade for climate progress. To meet the Paris Agreement goals, the world must cut greenhouse gas emissions 55% in less than 10 years. Yet a persistent gap remains between the capital needed and the capital actually being deployed. Astonishingly, only about 2% of philanthropy globally goes toward climate mitigation.

“Climate change is a threat multiplier, deepening crises and making them worse,” said Kitt. “Philanthropy is a solution multiplier.”

While total climate philanthropy appears to be on the rise, it remains far below what’s required to address the climate crisis. And the challenge isn’t merely the scale of capital, but also where the capital is directed. 

Too often, funding flows toward the familiar, visible, or easily marketable, not necessarily toward what science tells us will have the greatest impact on climate change. 

Philanthropic giving and impact investing can work in collaboration with other public and private sources of funding to increase the impact of climate mitigation. We can be far more strategic in both how and where capital is deployed to increase the speed and scale of climate solutions.

We know which climate solutions work, and we also know how we can strategically deploy them to provide maximum benefit. Let’s move capital to those areas first.

2. Science is available to guide capital decisions.

Science can help philanthropists and impact investors identify which climate solutions to prioritize, when and where, for rapid and effective progress. 

Drawdown Explorer synthesizes the most comprehensive research into an easy-to-use resource for informing climate action. The platform helps decision-makers identify which interventions have the biggest opportunities to reduce and avoid emissions by categorizing each as Highly Recommended, Worthwhile, Keep Watching, or Not Recommended.

An example: Last year Project Drawdown released a high-profile report on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asia, A Drawdown Roadmap for Food, Agriculture, and Land Use in Southeast Asia. In collaboration with the Asia Philanthropy Circle (APC), this report leveraged Project Drawdown solutions and showcased how using time- and geography-specific data can inform tangible recommendations that create real and impactful benefits for the region. In Vietnam’s river deltas, geospatial analysis showed that periodically draining rice paddies can reduce emissions by 17 million metric tons annually without compromising yields. 

3. TLC: Time, location, and co-benefits are key. 

Climate investments can be far more strategic – and impactful – when we pay attention to time, location, and co-benefits.

  • Time: Some solutions can act as “emergency brakes” to slow temperature rise in the short term and so compound impact over time. For instance, capital deployed right now focused on avoiding deforestation or rapidly reducing methane emissions can have have outsized impact, creating a runway to implement the full complement of solutions needed over time.
     
  • Location: Capital deployed toward solutions in geographic “hot spots” can have disproportionately high impact. For instance, capital deployed for solar or other renewable energy sources can clean power grids dominated by coal far more efficiently in some geographies than others
     
  • Co-benefitsCo-benefits are climate solution advantages beyond greenhouse gas mitigation, such as job creation or enhanced ecosystem services. Philanthropists and impact investors interested in a wide range of social and ecological benefits can simultaneously mitigate climate change and support economic or ecological benefits. A solution such as protecting coastal wetlands not only sequesters carbon, but also generates valuable co-benefits such as protecting coastal communities from extreme weather events, providing employment opportunities, and improving food security and human health.

4. Collaboration can unlock massive impact. 

Panelists underscored the opportunities that arise when private sector players collaborate for climate action. Working together on identified high-priority funding themes can lead to outsized impact. 

“This is humanity’s greatest collective action problem,” said Chow. “So it’s really collaboration and partnership at the vast scales that we need to achieve.”

This sort of multi-sector collaborative approach is exemplified by the Global Methane Hub, which unites funders and implementers to rapidly reduce methane emissions while centering collaboration. By unifying funders around this emergency-brake strategy, such efforts are helping mobilize the estimated US$48 billion in capital investments needed annually to reach 2030 methane abatement goals.

In addition to multi-sector collaboration, different forms of capital can also work together. A catalytic capital approach, in which philanthropy and impact investing can de-risk and unlock larger investments, is also key. 

“When we bring together multiple talent pools, we move things forward,” said Caldwell. “Rather than approaching them individually, it is more powerful to work together. You can leverage philanthropy to encourage breakthrough change.”

No single actor can close the climate funding gap alone. But when philanthropists, investors, scientists, policymakers, NGOs, and others operate from a shared understanding of what works, we can collectively direct resources toward the most effective solutions.

A call to action

To address climate change at the speed and scale this moment demands, we must not only bring more capital to the work, but also ensure the capital at play is aligned with science to make a catalytic impact. Further, to achieve the level of progress needed on priority funding pathways such as emergency brakes, we must collaborate across sectors.

This is a learning journey for all of us. Fortunately, resources are available to help guide the way.

Less than a year after sharing Drawdown Explorer with the world, Project Drawdown is increasingly focused on providing decision-support tools for key sectors, including the private sector, to turn information into effective action. 

Sign up here to learn more about the decision-support tools Project Drawdown is developing for philanthropists, impact investors, and others in the private sector.

Image
San Francisco Climate Week Private Sector Panel - room shot

The panel presented to a full house at The Melody in San Francisco, Calif.

Credit: NIKA131 Productions

Press Contacts

If you are a journalist and would like to republish Project Drawdown content, please contact press@drawdown.org.