July 26, 2022

Hitting the “emergency brake” on climate

by Jonathan Foley

There’s a hard truth about climate change: Meeting the Paris Accords—and limiting global warming to 1.5˚C or “well below” 2˚C—requires we stabilize emissions and then cut them nearly in half by the end of the decade.

Unfortunately, we’re falling behind. And many climate solutions can’t be deployed quickly enough to help. But some can. We must identify and rapidly scale the solutions that can act as an “Emergency Brake” for climate.

Addressing climate change demands that we take bold and immediate action—above anything we have done to date. It will require huge shifts in policy, capital, business, technology, and behavior. Fortunately, all of this is possible. We already have the tools we need, and more are being developed.

What do we have to do? And when do we have to do it?

Numerous researchers have developed scenarios to show how we might stop climate change and meet the “Paris Accords.” This would limit planetary warming to 1.5˚C or “well below” 2˚C. (We’re seeing ~1.1˚C of warming already.) While each scenario makes different assumptions about technology, economics, and policy, they have patterns in common. According to the “Carbon Law”—a framework adapted from these scenarios—we need to immediately stabilize and cut greenhouse gas emissions nearly in half by the early 2030s, and reach “net zero” emissions by the early 2050s.

Figure 1. Following the “Carbon Law” would limit global warming to 1.5˚C or “well below” 2˚C, per the Paris Accords. It requires stabilizing emissions now, followed by dramatic emissions cuts—nearly 50 percent in the first decade alone. We will need to cut emissions even further in the 2030s and 2040s. Any remaining emissions would be “canceled out” by carbon removal projects in the 2040s. Graphic by J.Foley © 2022

Figure 2. The “Carbon Law” tells us that we must stabilize and cut the world’s emissions by nearly 50 percent in roughly a decade. Graphic by J.Foley © 2022

But here’s the hard part: More than half the work to stop climate change must be done in roughly 10 years. And we are falling behind.

What’s that Rod Stewart song? “The First Cut Is the Deepest”

To start, we must stabilize emissions as quickly as possible. Unfortunately, this hasn’t happened yet. But there are signs that emissions could peak soon, thanks to ongoing emissions cuts in many countries (including the US, much of Europe, and elsewhere) and the anticipated flattening of emissions in China within the next five years.

But that’s only the beginning. We also need to cut emissions everywhere we can, as quickly as possible, with the goal of slashing global emissions nearly in half by the early 2030s.

Unfortunately, in 2022, we are starting to miss the window of opportunity to meet this goal.

To get back on track, we need “Emergency Brake” measures to reduce emissions as quickly as possible.

They must be ready to go now, without delay. They can’t wait for new infrastructure to be built. They can’t wait for new technology to be developed. And they can’t wait for nature to accumulate carbon in trees and soils.

Figure 3. We need to stabilize and cut emissions by roughly 50% by the early 2030s—but we are falling behind. To get back on track, we need “Emergency Brake” measures to reduce emissions as quickly as possible, without waiting for new infrastructure, new technologies, or nature. Graphic by J.Foley © 2022

We need to identify the fastest, largest, and lowest-cost climate solutions we can deploy—right now.

To start, I would focus on deforestation, fugitive emissions of methane from fossil fuels, and “black carbon” emissions from dirty cookstoves, biomass burning, and other sources.

Deforestation is particularly important, accounting for ~12 percent of the world’s emissions, and rising. (For comparison, the United States emits ~11 percent, and falling, of the world’s greenhouse gases.) Moreover, deforestation is highly concentrated in a few regions, where forests are cleared to raise cattle, animal feed, and palm oil. Focused efforts in Brazil and Indonesia could make a huge difference.

We also need to focus on potent, short-lived climate pollutants. Reducing methane and “black carbon” emissions helps in the short term, as they pack a big warming punch up front. Cutting these emissions now helps us slow warming in the short run, as we cut other emissions.

This graph illustrates the “pulse response” of the Earth’s climate to a single year’s emissions. In the short-term (under ~20 years), the effects of methane and black carbon cause roughly half the warming. In the longer run (~20 years and beyond) long-lived gases like carbon dioxide dominate. Adapted from Figure 8.33 in the IPCC Fifth Assessment. Graphic by J.Foley © 2021

Other “Emergency Brake” solutions could focus on waste and efficiency. There are enormous opportunities to be more efficient in electricity (especially in buildings and industrial processes), industry (through better management of materials), transportation (through increased fuel efficiency and alternative transportation), and buildings (with weatherization, insulation, and automation). And we should cut food waste (~30–40 percent of the world’s food is never eaten), which can lower emissions significantly.

There are a few other things where emissions cuts could happen quickly without harming vulnerable people. Phasing out cryptocurrencies, private air travel, fast fashion, and truly excessive consumption come to mind.

There are obstacles to implementing these solutions, of course. None of them would happen simply by wishing. But they are among the lowest-hanging fruits, and that’s what we need for quick results.

“Emergency Brake” solutions address the immediate problem of stabilizing and cutting emissions. But this won’t get the whole job done. Fortunately, these aren’t the only tools we have. In fact, we can pursue several waves of climate action — all starting today, unfolding differently over time.

In parallel with “Emergency Brake” solutions, we need to build new infrastructure, restore ecosystems and create nature-based climate solutions, and deploy new technologies that aren’t ready today.

Figure 5. We need multiple waves of climate solutions unfolding between now and 2050 to stop climate change. The “Emergency Brake” needs to focus on immediate opportunities to stabilize and deeply cut emissions by the early 2030s—without new infrastructure, nature-based solutions, or new technologies. Other solutions are critical but will take longer to unfold. Graphic by J.Foley © 2022

Together, these parallel waves—unfolding over different timescales—will be able to help stop climate change by mid-century.

In the end, science—not hype, hope, or politics—must be used to prioritize our climate actions. And science mandates we deploy “Emergency Brake” solutions now to stabilize and dramatically cut emissions. Science tells us that other solutions are needed too, with new infrastructure, nature, and new technologies.

While I like a “big tent” to address climate change—with all potential solutions having an equal seat at the table—the science underlying Earth’s climate has other ideas. Simply put, we have to prioritize what to fund now and what to do first.

It’s like building a house. You need to start with the foundation, before building the walls and roof. If you don’t, the house falls down.

More Insights

Feature  |  March 21, 2023
Students in Lushoto, Tanzania care for seedlings at school.
Women leading climate action through agriculture, education, and health
by Carissa Patrone Maikuri
On March 9, Project Drawdown’s Drawdown Lift program hosted a lively discussion with the Clean Cooking Alliance about how women are leading on climate action and climate justice and implementing solutions that strengthen adaptation, boost human well-being, and mitigate future emissions. As a continuation of International Women’s Day, we embraced equity, focusing on two of the most defining challenges of our time—climate change and poverty. Watch the recording here.   Advancing gender equality is central to ensuring that our global community thrives and addresses the climate crisis. Women are problem solvers and central to guiding the world to reach drawdown, boosting resilience, and creating systemic change. Women must be represented in all levels of decision-making, and our agency—as leaders, activists, educators, and entrepreneurs—should not be underestimated. We also acknowledge our allies who continue to ensure that we have a seat at the table and that our voices are heard and valued.    Moderated by Wanjira Mathai, community builder and managing director of Africa & Global Partnerships with World Resources Institute, the event featured four amazing panelists who shared wisdom and tangible examples from the fields of agriculture, education, clean cooking, health, and climate justice. Panelists included: Makandi Laiboni, leader of the digital team for One Acre Fund’s Kenya’s program, Tupande, which designs and implements the organization’s digital vision and strategy directly for smallholder farmers. Natasha Lwanda, the former national chairperson of the CAMFED Association, who uses her intimate experience of poverty and exclusion to support vulnerable young women and girls to become influential change-makers in Zambia.  Patience Alifo, the co-founder of Econexus Ventures Limited, a Ghanaian-based biotechnology social enterprise commercializing sustainable biofuel and waste-to-energy production in Africa. Sohanur Rahman, the chief executive of a youth-led organization called Protiki Jubi Sangsad, or Bangladesh Model Youth Parliament, who also coordinates the largest youth network, YouthNet for Climate Justice, in Bangladesh. Each panelist had a different reason for why they were inspired to do the work they do, including experiencing extreme weather events and gender inequality firsthand, identifying major gender gaps that could lead to a pathway to prosperity, or advancing their personal commitments to give back to the community.  We know that climate change threatens decades of progress and exacerbates pre-existing inequities—particularly in countries most vulnerable to climate change who have contributed the least to it—but solutions are at hand. Building off Project Drawdown’s Climate-Poverty Connections report, panelists spoke to several of the 28 mitigation solutions that also substantially contribute to boosting human well-being, strengthening resilience, and alleviating poverty.
Read more
Profile  |  February 23, 2023
Drawdown Science profile: James Gerber
This article is the third in a series introducing the members of Project Drawdown’s new science team. James Gerber is a data scientist with expertise in agriculture, impacts of land use on the environment, modeling of crop yields, and ocean wave energy. He uses various analytic techniques to assess the effect of climate mitigation solutions in the land use sector. As a researcher with the Institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota, James studied connections among agriculture, ecosystems, climate, and food security. He was a lead author for the Sixth Assessment Report of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and has consulted on a wide variety of projects for nongovernmental organizations, including The Nature Conservancy, The Packard Foundation, and The World Bank. Before he started researching land use, James worked on optimizing conversion of wave energy to electricity. He holds a Ph.D. in physics from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Here, James explains how he got from wave physics to climate change mitigation, trash talks American drivers, avoids sharing his favorite drawdown solution, and nails the answer to the most important question ever asked.  Q: When people ask what you do with Project Drawdown, what do you tell them?  A: I haven't been here very long, so my answer is based on what I think I’ll be doing and why I was so excited to get this job. Project Drawdown is really focused on making solutions happen. For the last 13 years I’ve been in a somewhat academic world defining what problems are in the land use sector, particularly with agriculture, and showing how big the impact is and looking at what some solutions could look like and what sectors and regions they could be most effective in, but those were not necessarily actionable. What I’m excited about at Project Drawdown is taking the next step and helping to formulate those solutions in a way they can really easily be implemented to achieve climate and other goals at the same time.  Q: What do you see as the biggest obstacles to solving climate change?  A: In some ways people don’t realize how doable it is. There are so many things out there that are win-wins and will pay for themselves and have all sorts of good co-benefits, and people aren’t aware of that. So a lack of knowledge, and maybe a little bit of pessimism that goes along with that. Also, there are often vested interests in keeping things the way they are. There’s no lobby for industries that don't yet exist, but there are lobbies for things that society might want to sunset. So there’s this knowledge problem and there’s this momentum problem as well. Q: What’s your superpower? A: I feel like I'm a pretty good programmer, in that I think I come up with clever algorithms to solve data analysis issues.  Q: What is the best (or worst) experience you’ve had that involved a bicycle?  A: I did my junior year in southern France. I was super poor, so I took a bicycle out of the trash and started biking around. I was pulling on the handlebars and peddling, and all of a sudden one handlebar fell off. I turned into traffic next to me and fell over—I thought I was going to be squashed. In America I might have been, but French drivers are really good. This guy slammed on his brakes and did not hit me.  Q: What was the subject of your Ph.D. dissertation?  A: Acoustic propagation through internal waves in the ocean. Q: And how did you get from there to here?  A: I did my postdoctoral work on wave theory in Paris, then we moved for my wife’s job to Princeton. I was offered a postdoctoral position at Princeton in Environmental Science, and I was offered a job at a small startup doing ocean wave energy. I felt the world did not need another postdoc but I could make a difference with wave energy so I took the job in renewable energy. Later, when we moved to Minnesota, I wanted to stay in an environmental field so I took a position at the Institute on the Environment at the intersection of environment and agriculture. Moving to Project Drawdown is a logical next step in the trajectory of my career from siloed technical work to impact-focused and policy-relevant. I really think I can have an impact here. Q: What’s your favorite Drawdown Solution and why?  A: It’s hard to choose a favorite. It’s like asking which is my favorite child. Can I get back to you on that one?  Q: Speaking of favorite children, any advice for parenting young adults?  A: Find a balance between having the current and future versions of your child angry at you.  Q: What gives you hope?  A: The fact that even though there is pessimism out there, we’re really making progress as a society and I think the word is getting out there. There are all sorts of examples of entities that have decreased their carbon footprint while improving quality of life. There are so many technologies that are coming online right now. Miracles are not needed; we just need to implement what we have. Together, these give me hope. Q: What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything? A: 42. Come on.
Read more