Climate One honors Jonathan Foley, Ph.D., with Schneider Award for climate communication

Presented annually by Climate One, the Schneider Award honors climate scientists who have gone above and beyond the realm of academia in their efforts to communicate climate change to the public.

“In the face of disinformation and delay tactics, it’s more important than ever for scientists working on climate change to stand up and share their expertise with the world,” Foley says. “It’s an honor to be recognized with the Schneider Award for this often overlooked, but essential role that scientists can – and should – play in shaping the conversation around climate change.” 

“Jonathan’s leadership at Project Drawdown – assembling science into accessible solutions – is exactly the kind of climate science communication the public needs right now,” says Climate One Founder Greg Dalton. “Through presentations, interviews, articles, and more, Jonathan shows that not only is a world without a climate crisis possible, but we already have everything we need to get there.”

Established in honor of Stephen H. Schneider, Ph.D., one of the founding fathers of climatology, Climate One’s Schneider Award recognizes a natural or social scientist who has made extraordinary scientific contributions and communicated that knowledge to a broad public in a clear, compelling fashion. Past winners include Leah Stokes, Ayana Elizabeth Johnson, Ben Santer, Katharine Hayhoe, Robert Bullard, Jane Lubchenco, and Michael Mann.

The Schneider Award will be presented to Foley during a live event at The Commonwealth Club in San Francisco on December 3, 2025, at 6 p.m. PT. Tickets to attend the event in-person or via the virtual livestream are available here.


Press Contacts
Skylar Knight, skylar.knight@drawdown.org 
Interviews available upon request


About Project Drawdown
Project Drawdown is the world’s leading guide to science-based climate solutions. Our mission is to drive meaningful climate action around the world. A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, Project Drawdown is funded by individual and institutional donations.

About Climate One 
Climate One from The Commonwealth Club is the premier platform for empowering conversations that connect all aspects of the climate emergency. Through our podcast, national radio show, and live convenings for thought leaders and concerned members of the public, we create opportunities for dialogue and inspire a more complete understanding of the current crisis.

Image
Jon Foley presenting at TED
Off

Project Drawdown is thrilled to announce that Executive Director Jonathan Foley, Ph.D., is the 2025 winner of the prestigious Stephen H. Schneider Award for Outstanding Climate Science Communication.

Description for Social and Search
Award recognizes scientists who go above and beyond in their efforts to communicate climate change
Include in Home Insights and News Feed
On

Use Methane Removal

Cluster
Methane Removal
Image
Image
Peatland
Coming Soon
On
Description for Social and Search
Use Methane Removal is a "Keep Watching" climate solution.
Solution in Action
Speed of Action
left_text_column_width
Caveats
left_text_column_width
Risks
left_text_column_width
Consensus
left_text_column_width
Trade-offs
left_text_column_width
Action Word
Use
Solution Title
Methane Removal
Classification
Keep Watching
Lawmakers and Policymakers
Practitioners
Business Leaders
Nonprofit Leaders
Investors
Philanthropists and International Aid Agencies
Thought Leaders
Technologists and Researchers
Communities, Households, and Individuals
Updated Date

Improve Steel Production

Image
Image
Peatland
Coming Soon
On
Summary

Improve Steel Production involves replacing the use of fossil fuels in making steel from iron ore with electrolytic hydrogen and clean electricity. Doing so could reduce emissions from steel production by more than 90%. Although the necessary technologies exist, adoption has been very limited, with the major barriers being the cost of clean electricity and the availability of suitable iron ore. Other strategies for reducing the emissions from steel production typically rely on bioenergy sources or carbon capture and storage (CCS), which have limited potential to reduce emissions. As demand for steel grows globally, new policies are needed to increase market demand for low-emissions steel. Given the lack of improved steel facilities and supportive policies today, we will “Keep Watching” this solution.

Description for Social and Search
Improve Steel Production involves replacing the use of fossil fuels in making steel from iron ore with electrolytic hydrogen and clean electricity.
Overview

What is our assessment?

Based on our analysis, Improve Steel Production using H2-DRI-EAF powered by clean electricity has the potential to significantly reduce emissions. However, while the individual technologies for H2-DRI-EAF are mature and their combined use has been piloted, the process has not yet been adopted in a meaningful way. We will “Keep Watching” this solution, but it is not ready for widespread adoption.

Plausible Could it work? Yes
Ready Is it ready? No
Evidence Are there data to evaluate it? Yes
Effective Does it consistently work? Yes
Impact Is it big enough to matter? Yes
Risk Is it risky or harmful? No
Cost Is it cheap? No

What is it?

Currently, making steel from iron ore relies heavily on coal and other fossil fuels to provide heat and reducing agents (chemicals that remove oxygen from iron ore). Improve Steel Production refers to using electric heat and hydrogen produced by electrolysis to reduce the iron ore (H2-DRI) and electric arc furnaces (EAF) to melt the resulting iron and alloy it with carbon to make steel. The solution also requires the electricity used in these processes to include significant renewable energy or other low-carbon generation. The output is varying grades of steel with different degrees of hardness and brittleness determined by slight variations in carbon content. This solution does not include processes that rely on bioenergy or CCS, since the emissions from burning bioenergy contribute to climate change and CCS is not an effective climate solution.  

Does it work?

Replacing fossil fuels in steelmaking with H2-DRI-EAF that uses electrolytic hydrogen and where all electricity comes from relatively clean sources results in significantly reduced emissions. Steel made today using fossil fuels for heat and as a reducing agent results in an estimated 1.8 t CO₂‑eq /t of steel. By contrast, steel made using H2-DRI-EAF and low-carbon electricity would generate an estimated 0.12 t CO₂‑eq /t of steel and is a more energy-efficient process. EAF furnaces are already very common in steelmaking and for recycling existing steel, but are rarely combined with H2-DRI. Although H2-DRI was first used on an industrial scale in 2001, that plant was shut down for economic and political reasons, and economics remain a barrier. Finally, technologies to make industrial hydrogen from electricity are mature, but most hydrogen produced today is made from fossil fuels and is carbon-intensive. Active research is exploring other technologies that could become important for improving steel production in the future, most notably aqueous or molten oxide electrolysis, both of which use electricity to directly remove oxygen from iron ore, and can be combined with EAF to make steel.  

Why are we excited?

Steelmaking is classified as a hard-to-abate industry, and H2-DRI-EAF powered by clean electricity is considered one of the best strategies for cutting emissions in this sector. The Net Zero Industry project forecasts that under an emissions-neutral steel scenario by 2050, roughly 40% of global steel production could depend on H2-DRI-EAF, with the remainder consisting of recycled steel (47%), steelmaking with CCS (11%), or technologies not yet defined (2%). The impact is potentially significant, given that steelmaking accounted for an estimated 3.7 Gt of CO₂‑eq in 2019. Improved steelmaking has the additional benefit of reducing air and land pollution, as burning coal releases fine particulate matter, heavy metals, and other pollutants. In China, steel production is the largest industrial source of air pollution. As demand for steel is expected to increase up to 30% by 2050 due to demand from India and other low- and middle-income countries, it is critical that new and existing production shift to cleaner, lower-emission technologies, and that policies supporting this shift be implemented.  

Why are we concerned?

While proposed low-emission steel projects have attracted significant attention from the press, many have since been canceled or put on hold. As of 2025, we could find references to only a few pilot facilities producing improved steel as we have defined it here. The entire H2-DRI-EAF process is considered to be at the large-scale prototype demonstration stage. However, contributing technologies such as electrolytic hydrogen production and EAF are more mature, and H2-DRI was first used on an industrial scale in 2001. The higher cost of making low-emission steel is a significant barrier to industrial adoption and consumer demand. Electricity accounts for nearly half the cost of producing low-emission steel from iron ore. To increase adoption, improved steel facilities need to be located in areas that can readily supply both iron ore and abundant low-carbon, low-cost electricity. In areas such as China, where the electricity grid still relies heavily on fossil fuels, transitioning to H2-DRI-EAF risks increasing emissions unless dedicated renewables are integrated into the project. To move this solution forward, new policies are needed to create an international market for low-emission steel. Meanwhile, existing steelmaking facilities typically have lifetimes of 25–40 years, which increases the likelihood of stranded assets or continued reliance on fossil fuels by 2050. Under its Sustainable Development Scenario, the International Energy Agency (IEA) projects that, by 2050, only 12% of cumulative direct emissions reductions in steelmaking will be due to electrification and the use of hydrogen (the IEA considered emissions from electricity to be indirect). Reducing demand for steel, incremental efficiency gains, and CCS are expected to make up the bulk of cumulative direct emissions reductions, according to the IEA projections.

Solution in Action

Bataille, C., Stiebert, S., Li, F. (2021). Global facility level net-zero steel pathways. Net Zero Steel. Link to source: https://netzeroindustry.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/net_zero_steel_report.pdf

Devlin, A., Kossen, J., Goldie-Jones, H., & Yang, A. (2023). Global green hydrogen-based steel opportunities surrounding high quality renewable energy and iron ore deposits. Nature Communications14(1), 2578. Link to source: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38123-2

Hubner Australia. (n.d.). Green steel manufacturing: Processes and comparisons. Hubner Australia. Link to source: https://hubner.au/green-steel-manufacturing/

IEA. (2020). Iron and steel technology roadmap. Link to source: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/eb0c8ec1-3665-4959-97d0-187ceca189a8/Iron_and_Steel_Technology_Roadmap.pdf  

Kueppers, M., Hall, W., Levi, P., Simon, R., & Vass, T. (2023, July 11). Steel. IEA. Link to source: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/industry/steel  

Lang, S., Kopf, M., & Valery, R. (2021, November 18). Cicored fine ore direct reduction—A proven process to decarbonize steelmaking. Metso. Link to source: https://www.metso.com/insights/blog/mining-and-metals/circored-fine-ore-direct-reduction-a-proven-process-to-decarbonize-steelmaking/  

Leadit. (2025, May). Green steel tracker. Leadit Leadership Group for Industry Transition. Link to source: https://www.industrytransition.org/green-steel-tracker/  

McKinsey & Company. (2024). Green-steel hubs: A pathway to decarbonize the steel industry. McKinsey & Company. Link to source: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/metals-and-mining/our-insights/green-steel-hubs-a-pathway-to-decarbonize-the-steel-industry#/  

Milne, R. (2025, October 13). Flagship green steel start-up in funding crisis as Europe’s low-carbon ambitions falter. Financial Times. Link to source: https://www.ft.com/content/ac619c2d-9c7a-4208-baa5-6c648d10cacc  

Net Zero Industry. (n.d.). Net zero steel pathways. Net Zero Industry. Link to source: https://netzeroindustry.org/net-zero-parhways /

Russell, C. (2025, May 29). Green steel is distant and expensive, but teal steel is coming. Reuters. Link to source: https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/green-steel-is-distant-expensive-teal-steel-is-coming-russell-2025-05-29/  

Ryan, N. A., Miller, S. A., Skerlos, S. J., & Cooper, D. R. (2020). Reducing CO2 emissions from U.S. steel consumption by 70% by 2050. Environmental Science & Technology54(22). Link to source: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04321 

Wrede, I. (2025, July 19). ArcelorMittal’s pullout plunges German green steel in doubt. DW. Link to source: https://www.dw.com/en/arcelormittals-pullout-plunges-german-green-steel-in-doubt/a-73303680  

Zhang, J., Shen, H., Chen, Y., Meng, J., Li, J., He, J., Guo, P., Dai, R., Zhang, Y., Xu, R., Wang, J., Zheng, S., Lei, T., Shen, G., Wang, C., Ye, J., Zhu, L., Sun, H. Z., Fu, T.-M., … Tao, S. (2023). Iron and Steel Industry Emissions: A Global Analysis of Trends and Drivers. Environmental Science & Technology57(43), 16477–16488. Link to source: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05474  

Credits

Lead Fellow 

  • Heather McDiarmid, Ph.D.

Internal Reviewer

  • Christina Swanson, Ph.D.
Speed of Action
left_text_column_width
Caveats
left_text_column_width
Risks
left_text_column_width
Consensus
left_text_column_width
Trade-offs
left_text_column_width
Action Word
Improve
Solution Title
Steel Production
Classification
Keep Watching
Lawmakers and Policymakers
Practitioners
Business Leaders
Nonprofit Leaders
Investors
Philanthropists and International Aid Agencies
Thought Leaders
Technologists and Researchers
Communities, Households, and Individuals
Updated Date

New report provides roadmap for reducing emissions in the food, agriculture, and land use sector across Southeast Asia

In Southeast Asia, the food, agriculture, and land use (FALU) sector is directly responsible for 54% of greenhouse gas emissions – more than twice the global average – making it one of the most important regions in the world to focus on food-related climate solutions. In a report published today by Project Drawdown and funded by members of Singapore-based Asia Philanthropy Circle, researchers provide a detailed roadmap outlining exactly what solutions are needed, when and where, to maximize the impact of emissions reduction efforts in the FALU sector across Southeast Asia.

“How we treat forests and peatlands in Southeast Asia – one of the most carbon-rich places on Earth – will be key to our climate future,” says Project Drawdown researcher Emily Cassidy, who co-authored the report. “Fortunately, as we show in this report, solutions exist that can significantly reduce emissions while improving the health, resilience, and economic security of communities.”

By synthesizing and analyzing data from hundreds of sources, the researchers show where FALU emissions are coming from across all 11 countries in the region, down to the provincial level. Moreover, they pinpoint geographic hot spots with the greatest potential for emissions reduction per land area without reducing crop yields.

“When you dive into the data, you find opportunities abound for farmers, philanthropists, and climate leaders to dramatically and efficiently reduce emissions,” says Project Drawdown Senior Scientist James Gerber, Ph.D., who co-authored the study. “For instance, focusing protection on just 20% of Indonesia’s carbon-densest forests could reduce 80% of the country’s deforestation emissions. Hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide, with one-fifth of the forest.” 

Similarly, the researchers find that 64% of emissions savings from improved rice cultivation could be achieved on 20% of rice farms, and 80% of emissions savings from improved nutrient management could come from focusing on 20% of farms using excess fertilizers. “We kept uncovering this 80-20 phenomenon, wherein most of the emissions from a particular place, source, or practice could be reduced by implementing a solution over a relatively small area,” Gerber says.

Importantly, many of the climate solutions in the FALU sector that were assessed are emergency brake solutions that reduce potent, fast-acting greenhouse gases, such as methane, or prevent large pulses of emissions, such as from deforestation. Such solutions can play an outsized role in rapidly bending the curve on greenhouse gas emissions.

Beyond analyzing the emissions reductions of various FALU climate solutions, the researchers also discuss how these solutions may affect the economic and environmental well-being of local communities. They find that many of the solutions offer numerous benefits, including enhanced air and water quality, increased climate resilience, and more effective adaptation to extreme weather, all while boosting yields and farmer incomes. “For most of the solutions we analyze, we find that reducing emissions and improving environmental and human well-being is not either-or,” Cassidy says. “It’s yes-and.”

“Our members identified the knowledge gaps and commissioned this report to help provide a better understanding of the food and land use sectors’ impact on climate, biodiversity, and health in the region, which until now had been very fragmented,” says Esther Chang, CEO of the Asia Philanthropy Circle (APC), a community of philanthropists working together to drive collective action for Asia’s most pressing challenges. 

“For the first time, we know which sectors and provinces we need to focus our attention on to address some of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions across Southeast Asia. Moving forward, we will convene our members, regional and global funders, and practitioners to explore how best to act on these findings through deep collaboration and collective impact,” she adds.

Key Findings

  • Southeast Asia’s FALU sector could reduce emissions by 1.9 billion tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent per year without a reduction in crop yields
  • Deforestation and other land cover changes are the biggest drivers of emissions in most places (56% of provinces), followed by rice cultivation (42% of provinces) and overuse of nitrogen fertilizers (2% of provinces)
  • Rice production generates almost one-third of regional methane emissions, and improved water management could reduce emissions by 64 million tons per year without reducing yields
  • Targeted interventions in high-priority areas can yield major emissions reductions with “80:20” opportunities wherein roughly 80% of the climate benefits can be achieved by focusing on 20% of the area


Press Contacts
Skylar Knight, skylar.knight@drawdown.org 
Theresa Cua, theresa@asiaphilanthropycircle.org 
Interviews and Drawdown Explorer demos available upon request


About Project Drawdown
Project Drawdown is the world’s leading guide to science-based climate solutions. Our mission is to drive meaningful climate action around the world. A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, Project Drawdown is funded by individual and institutional donations.

About Asia Philanthropy Circle
ASIA PHILANTHROPY CIRCLE is a community of philanthropists working together to solve Asia’s most challenging problems. Founded in 2015 by philanthropists, for philanthropists, APC is a safe, trusted space for peers to connect, exchange, and collaborate for lasting impact across the region. APC has since grown to over 60 members across 12 markets. APC is a registered charity headquartered in Singapore with roots throughout the region. 

Image
An image of a man in a rice paddy at sunset
Off

Project Drawdown researchers reveal province-level priorities for reducing emissions throughout the region

Description for Social and Search
Project Drawdown researchers reveal province-level priorities for reducing emissions throughout the region
Include in Home Insights and News Feed
On

Senior Analyst, Climate Philanthropy & Investing

Philanthropy and private investing have the potential to play a far more powerful role in halting climate change. To achieve this, more capital must be directed toward the most effective, science-based solutions. Project Drawdown is the world’s leading guide to science-based climate solutions. Now, through a new initiative, we are working to shift capital toward solutions that can halt climate change most quickly.

Subscribe to

Support Climate Action

Drawdown Delivered

Join the 85,000+ subscribers discovering how to drive meaningful climate action around the world! Every other week, you'll get expert insights, cutting-edge research, and inspiring stories.

Receive biweekly email newsletter updates from Project Drawdown. Unsubscribe at any time.